The stength of the AK is it's longevity. With support the AR will win any contest, so it's really kinda pointless.
Pointless for some, but there are still people out there who are learning about the differences between these two platforms.BB said:The stength of the AK is it's longevity. With support the AR will win any contest, so it's really kinda pointless.
We will, not this week but I think that is in the works.mrmoshzilla said:just go take a serious class with them.
Actually this is what I hope to learn.modern_pirate said:No offense, but you won't learn anything useful.
Firstly, your sample size is too small to be meaningful.
Secondly, you have no way to control for variables.
Thirdly, you have no peer-reviewed testing methodology to use.
As others have said, you will have fun shooting though. :wink:
M_P
I have read this it is pretty funny. I especially agree with the conclusion.Tx Dogblaster said:A very good friend of mine wrote this several years ago. It should prove to be useful in your research. Ezra is personally responsible for my AK building addiction and my wife will never let him forget about it...
http://www.mouseguns.com/compare.htm
My little sister hasnt shot either and is not afraid to. Might be a perfect candidate.JoeMomma said:Some suggestions:
Accuracy test
Reliability; how many rounds out of each before a stoppage
Ergonomics
Which one cleans up the fastest
Another idea would be to find someone that does not know weapons at all, and see how long it takes to teach them basic marksmanship, care and maintenance of both weapons.
I"ve used the M16 platform since 1985, and I"ve been comfortable with it. That being said, it does have some disadvantages.
I also like the AK, but it also has some issues. Both have their strengths, and weaknesses.
It's funny you mentioned this... I started a thread over at thehighroad.org asking specifically about the ammo we should use.Shrike37 said:Just one little pet peeve of mine when people compare the whole AR vs AK thing is accuracy. It is accepted fact that an AR can definitely out shoot an AK; however, usually people are using decent quality brass 5.56 in their AR and Wolf or some other cheap Russian 7.62x39 in their AK. This tends to widen the perceived accuracy difference.
If you are going to test accuracy, do it with the similar quality levels of ammo (ie Wolf Black Box or Military Classic in both rifles). Or if you are going medium+ quality AR ammo, use a similar quality 7.62x39 like Lapua or some decent year Chinese.
Also, I would suggest testing practical accuracy in different positions (standing, kneeling, and prone). When not resting the rifle on a bench or sandbags, the accuracy difference between rifles much smaller for the average person. I would also throw in a benched test as well for good measure.
PS: make sure you are using well broken in rifles for these tests. It would be a waste of ammo to try and compare the reliability of the AK vs the AR when, for instance, you have a brand new AR.
And comments like this all over the internet are the reason we are going to see for ourselves. Not really looking to convince anyone but ourselves either.BigAL said:Not a fair comparison
AK = machinegun with semi auto rifle capability
M-16 (AR) = Rifle with full auto capability