I haven't decided whether I want to spend as little as possible ($650-700) or fork over the extra money for a premium gun at around $1000. I'm really just buying a range gun although I would like it to be reliable as well.
My understanding is that foreign AKs are superior generally. It seems like you can find a foreign made AK at all the price points in that range. However, the PSA models benefit from the side folders & AK-103 model. I'm not sure if those benefits make up for the quality control issues or even detract from the enjoyment of the classic AK.
At $700, it looks like my best options are between the pioneer AK-47 with the Polish parts and the standard AK-103 from PSA.
At around $1,000, it looks like my best options are between a zastava ak or a side folder PSA AK 103 with the premium barrel. A Romanian build kit from PSA or a k USA 103 in that price range are also on the table, but seen a little overpriced.
What do you all think?
My understanding is that foreign AKs are superior generally. It seems like you can find a foreign made AK at all the price points in that range. However, the PSA models benefit from the side folders & AK-103 model. I'm not sure if those benefits make up for the quality control issues or even detract from the enjoyment of the classic AK.
At $700, it looks like my best options are between the pioneer AK-47 with the Polish parts and the standard AK-103 from PSA.
At around $1,000, it looks like my best options are between a zastava ak or a side folder PSA AK 103 with the premium barrel. A Romanian build kit from PSA or a k USA 103 in that price range are also on the table, but seen a little overpriced.
What do you all think?