Not at all.
Even if they had a way to enforce such a draconian concept ( Far too few LEOs would be available, and many would refuse), it would go right to the Supreme Court. The Dimokrats could not risk that either. The more dramatic talk by politicians Right Now is just a distraction from their confused attempts to deal with the Wuhan Virus, closed schools, lost jobs and declining mental abilities/energy of our Dear Leader.
Joe's Handlers seriously want to use 'politically correct' anti-gun speeches to distract Americans, but also get the d****d Far Left groups off their backs (at least their lobby groups)...for some breathing space.
There are various reasons why Sleepy Joe's handlers never told him to try to sign any EOs adding just relatively Moderate (i.e. UBC/checks) federal gun regulations; and he didn't order the ATF to do so either....
Future desired stiff tax increases on ammo, guns and bans on imported ammo would begin a cycle which could inhibit more and more gun sales. When done in phases, the general public is not even aware.
DC politicians know that state govts. have many methods, i.e. CA, NY, NJ, MA etc to gradually pass more restrictive regulations on ownership.
Although some factors have changed, it's interesting that even with the focus on guns after the Newtown horror

, Obama talked, but enacted nothing: no EOs, no major or minor legislation against guns in Congress. Not even UBS (u. background checks).
Re-elections are all they really care about and factor into everything. Or did they actually stop caring? Very doubtful.