Trump wants to ban suppressors
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29
Like Tree73Likes

Thread: Trump wants to ban suppressors

  1. #1
    Senior Member

    Member #
    22431
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    349
    Liked
    587 times

    Trump wants to ban suppressors

    Trump is now thinking about banning suppressors after banning Bump stocks, Trump said in an interview with Piers Morgan.

    https://freebeacon.com/issues/trump-...ing-silencers/
    Kalliste likes this.
    Dear Socialists: I have no money for you. I spent it all on guns and ammo.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator
    Supporting Member

    Member #
    21201
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    13,102
    Liked
    8364 times
    I call bullshit on it. First of all, Piers Morgan?.... Any article with that guys name is in your guaranteed lies are coming out of his mouth. Secondly, trump is known for saying one thing to appease the masses but doing another. Third, remember the hearing protection bill that his son has tried hard to pass? The whole article stinks.

  3. #3
    Senior Member

    Member #
    61979
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    A dark, ruined castle in Transylvania. Otherwise known as Mississippi
    Posts
    334
    Liked
    812 times
    All I got to say bout Trump. He supported the AWB, “ take guns now, due process later “ and he got bump stocks banned. So don’t put banning cans above him. Now with that aside, it may be time for those on the fence about getting a can or selling one. Now is the time to spring.
    43m1garand and Kalliste like this.
    Interested in Middle Eastern, South Asian and Yugoslavian AKs and gear. Only a woman can break his spell...

  4. Remove Advertisements
    TheAKForum.net
    Advertisements
     

  5. #4
    Super Moderator
    Supporting Member

    Member #
    21201
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    13,102
    Liked
    8364 times
    If you look throughout history, republican presidents have done more damage to our gun rights than democrat presidents.

    Either way, not saying trump hasnt done damage but on this suppressor incident, i dont see him backing it.
    Mullo98, scottyb, Walleye and 6 others like this.

  6. #5
    Senior Member

    Member #
    55105
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    701
    Liked
    1163 times
    Quote Originally Posted by 22many View Post
    If you look throughout history, republican presidents have done more damage to our gun rights than democrat presidents.

    Either way, not saying trump hasnt done damage but on this suppressor incident, i dont see him backing it.
    I agree, if he banned suppressors it would be political suicide.
    "Cause bitches don't like to be slapped on the cheek. Yugos need real men to shoot them who know how to hold them tight"
    -daefash


    "Only a woman's glance strikes harder than an assault rifle."
    -
    Mikhail Kalashnikov

  7. #6
    Supporting Member
    Supporting Member

    Member #
    26489
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Upstate, SC
    Posts
    1,008
    Liked
    922 times
    Quote Originally Posted by njkalashnikov View Post
    I agree, if he banned suppressors it would be political suicide.
    Why? Banning bump stocks didn't get him impeached. FUDDS don't care about your suppressor, a lot of states don't allow them to be used to hunt due to anti-poaching laws, etc, etc.
    As far as whatever he said on Piers Morgan being a lie, whatever... there's video footage of him last week getting on Marine One on the white house grounds after the shooting in VA and the press asked him about suppressors and his answer was "I don't like them, I don't like them at all". So, just how much do you expect him to do?

    Trump is not the be all end all to gun rights that people try to portray him as, he got elected under an "Anyone but Hillary" ticket from a good bit of the republican base.

    Are we better off with him in office than hillary from a 2a standpoint, oh god yes, 100% better, but he's still willing to sell out your rights, after all, there's just a small percentage of gun owners who have suppressors, just like there was a small percentage of gun owners who had bumpfire stocks.

    It would be extremely hard to ban them since they're already regulated and taxed, but it wouldn't be hard to get them removed from the registers for new builds, just like they did with machine guns.
    WTB
    1960s-1986 Russian Kits | Subgun kits of any kind
    1973 dated kits and guns | AIMR-74-PM MD 86 Barrel
    Polish NSP3 Nr L-90048
    PM me, can pay $ or possibly trade.

  8. #7
    Senior Member

    Member #
    62737
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    291
    Liked
    151 times
    Trump will be Trump, but he's still a million times better than that worn out boot Hillary.

  9. #8
    Super Moderator
    Supporting Member

    Member #
    13964
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    6,904
    Liked
    3565 times
    Oh really? If Clinton had gotten elected, any anti-gun legislation would have been stopped dead in the Senate. If Trump wants to ban suppressors, the House will go with him (for the first time) and the Senate will line up behind him like the stooges they truly are. They aren't there to protect your rights, they are there solely to gain advantage for the wealthy, and gun rights are nothing more than the bait of the moment to blind us to their corrupt thievery.
    LOOKING FOR: Postban Chicom (squareback) Rifle, '65 EG MPi-KM kit, Soviet and East German AKM Barrels, Soviet AKM U/F Stock Assembly, Polish Milled Receiver Front Stub

    I can organize and sell your Commbloc weapon/parts/accessory collection
    if you lack the time or desire; send a PM if interested.

    Kalashnikov Collectors Association

  10. #9
    Senior Member

    Member #
    22431
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    349
    Liked
    587 times
    Quote Originally Posted by 22many View Post
    I call bullshit on it. First of all, Piers Morgan?.... Any article with that guys name is in your guaranteed lies are coming out of his mouth. Secondly, trump is known for saying one thing to appease the masses but doing another. Third, remember the hearing protection bill that his son has tried hard to pass? The whole article stinks.
    Did you read the article? It was not wrote by Piers Morgan. Trump said he wanted to ban suppressors in an interview with Piers. The article is from the Washington Free Beacon, not even close to a liberal site. Free Beacon got an award from The Heritage Foundation for journalism. Trump was anti-gun up until running for president in 2016. This is one of the many reasons I did not vote for Trump.
    Kalliste likes this.
    Dear Socialists: I have no money for you. I spent it all on guns and ammo.

  11. #10
    Super Moderator
    Supporting Member

    Member #
    21201
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    13,102
    Liked
    8364 times
    Quote Originally Posted by 43m1garand View Post
    Did you read the article? It was not wrote by Piers Morgan. Trump said he wanted to ban suppressors in an interview with Piers. The article is from the Washington Free Beacon, not even close to a liberal site. Free Beacon got an award from The Heritage Foundation for journalism. Trump was anti-gun up until running for president in 2016. This is one of the many reasons I did not vote for Trump.
    Yeah i read it. Like i said, trump has been known for saying things to appease the masses. Do i doubt that he said it? No, not for a minute. Do i believe it? No, not for a minute.

    Antigun or not, like ive always said, you vote for the lesser of the two evils.

  12. #11
    Senior Member

    Member #
    24282
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    386
    Liked
    296 times
    Quote Originally Posted by AZAK View Post
    Oh really? If Clinton had gotten elected, any anti-gun legislation would have been stopped dead in the Senate. If Trump wants to ban suppressors, the House will go with him (for the first time) and the Senate will line up behind him like the stooges they truly are. They aren't there to protect your rights, they are there solely to gain advantage for the wealthy, and gun rights are nothing more than the bait of the moment to blind us to their corrupt thievery.
    Amen brother. Trump already damaged 2nd amendment rights more than Obama did. We get barrelless kits now thanks to Bush the second, We get no FALs or HK rifles thanks to Bush the first.
    Thrasher, 43m1garand and Kalliste like this.

  13. #12
    Super Moderator
    Supporting Member

    Member #
    13964
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    6,904
    Liked
    3565 times
    And we continue to NOT have all of those options - as well as zero progress on suppressor de-reg when the opportunity was there - thanks to Trump. These rights are meaningless to him, it’s obvious that effective weapons in the hands of common men fill him with the same unease and dread as all of the mega-rich. The 2nd Amendment is nothing more than a buzzword for jerking our chains at his incessant campaign rallies.
    daefash, PRDUBI, philippes and 3 others like this.
    LOOKING FOR: Postban Chicom (squareback) Rifle, '65 EG MPi-KM kit, Soviet and East German AKM Barrels, Soviet AKM U/F Stock Assembly, Polish Milled Receiver Front Stub

    I can organize and sell your Commbloc weapon/parts/accessory collection
    if you lack the time or desire; send a PM if interested.

    Kalashnikov Collectors Association

  14. #13
    Senior Member

    Member #
    4781
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    4,602
    Liked
    2562 times
    Dude live in Manhattan all his life and you guys are surprised?

  15. #14
    Senior Member

    Member #
    22431
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    349
    Liked
    587 times
    Quote Originally Posted by AZAK View Post
    And we continue to NOT have all of those options - as well as zero progress on suppressor de-reg when the opportunity was there - thanks to Trump. These rights are meaningless to him, it’s obvious that effective weapons in the hands of common men fill him with the same unease and dread as all of the mega-rich. The 2nd Amendment is nothing more than a buzzword for jerking our chains at his incessant campaign rallies.
    Concealed Carry Reciprocity was not passed either. Whenever Republicans have a chance to do something they do nothing. GOP had control of the House, Senate, and White House and did zero. It is not only with guns but many other things also.
    Last edited by AZAK; 06-07-2019 at 08:50 AM.
    Kalliste likes this.
    Dear Socialists: I have no money for you. I spent it all on guns and ammo.

  16. #15
    Senior Member

    Member #
    22431
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    349
    Liked
    587 times
    Quote Originally Posted by 22many View Post
    Yeah i read it. Like i said, trump has been known for saying things to appease the masses. Do i doubt that he said it? No, not for a minute. Do i believe it? No, not for a minute.

    Antigun or not, like ive always said, you vote for the lesser of the two evils.
    I voted independent. There are always more than two choices.
    Dear Socialists: I have no money for you. I spent it all on guns and ammo.

 

 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Sponsors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

There are currently no search engine referrals.
Click on a term to search our site for related topics.